Uploaded deck
Dynamic Agility LEGO Workshop · Multi-ART Coordination
The attached deck defines the second LEGO workshop: a facilitator guide for higher agile scaling, roadmapping, decision cadence and cross-ART realignment.
LEGO Value Stream Workshop
Coordinate several ARTs before local plans drift apart.
A LEGO-based multi-ART simulation for large solution roadmapping, ART forecasts, capacity trade-offs, supplier and platform dependencies, Solution Syncs and cross-ART realignment.
Intro Material
Workshop blueprint for Multi-ART coordination
The workshop builds on the LEGO Agility fundamentals but moves the learning problem one level up: from teams and one ART to several ARTs that must create one integrated value stream or solution.
Dynamic Agility research base
Roadmapping, Solution Conference and Solution Sync
The workshop uses the existing Dynamic Agility material on Solution Conferences, Solution Roadmaps, Solution Syncs and Large Solution Roadmapping as the conceptual backbone.
Scale decisions
The bottleneck is no longer more building, but better trade-off decisions across ARTs.
Make roadmaps negotiable
The roadmap is a hypothesis that becomes useful through forecasts, dependencies and updates.
Practice realignment
Change injects force Solution Syncs to make decisions and update artifacts, not just exchange status.
Use this when
Use the workshop when PI Planning alone is not enough.
It is especially strong when several ARTs or value streams deliver one integrated solution, when suppliers, architecture, security, compliance or platforms slow integration, or when a Value Stream / Solution Train Conference must be prepared.
Cross-ART dependencies
Several ARTs must coordinate capabilities, shared foundations, suppliers and release windows.
Roadmap uncertainty
The roadmap changes during execution and the organization needs faster update cycles.
Single ART scope
Use the LEGO Agility Workshop or a smaller PI Planning simulation when only one ART is affected.
No decision rights
Shorten if participants cannot make or at least simulate real cross-ART trade-off decisions.
Format options
Three lengths, three purposes.
Choose the depth by learning goal and audience. The standard one-day version runs about 6.5–7 hours plus breaks; short formats focus on awareness, while deep dives prepare real conferences.
2.5–3 hours
Focus on drivers, coordination pain and one compact Solution Sync exercise.
1 day
Roadmap, forecast, planning board, execution round, change inject and transfer.
2 days
Use real conference inputs, decision rights, industry-specific injects and a stronger transfer canvas.
1–2 days
Use the simulation to prepare a real Value Stream / Solution Train Conference.
Core artifacts
The boards are the operating system of the simulation.
LEGO makes integration physical, but the boards make decision capability visible. The simulation works best when every problem creates an artifact update, not just a conversation.
Large Solution Roadmap
PI 1, PI 2, PI 3 and H1 view with capabilities, milestones, suppliers, shared services, risks and decisions.
ART Forecast Board
Iteration forecast, business features, enablers, dependencies, risks, KTLO and available capacity.
Capability & Dependency Board
Capabilities mapped to needed ARTs, interfaces, NFRs, target PI, open decisions and owners.
Solution Sync Backlog
Decision-ready issue cards with impacted ARTs, decision needed, options, owner and due date.
Module 1
Why higher scaling?
Participants experience why more teams do not automatically solve integrated value, multi-transformation and management-gap problems.
The problem is above one ART
3 workshop moves
1.1
Complex Value
Each ART can build a beautiful local increment while the integrated system still fails through missing roads, platforms, security, data or releases.
1.2
Multi-Transformation
Architecture, DevOps, compliance, sustainability and platform work land at the same time and compete for the same capacity.
1.3
Management Gap
The mayor or portfolio level promises dates before integration, supplier risk and capacity are clear. The group needs a decision cycle, not silent overcommitment.
Module 2
Facilitator Setup
Set up the physical simulation, roles, boards, material kit and working agreements so the workshop becomes a safe laboratory for cross-ART coordination.
Prepare the room as a decision system
3 workshop moves
2.1
Position the second workshop
Explain that this workshop starts one level above the LEGO Agility basics: several ARTs must create one integrated regional system.
2.2
Build the room model
Prepare FutureREGION, the Large Solution Roadmap Board, ART Forecast Boards, Capability & Dependency Board and Solution Sync Backlog.
2.3
Establish working agreements
Make bad news valuable, status useful only when it improves decisions, and every decision backlog card owned by a named person.
Module 3
FutureREGION Simulation
FutureCITY becomes FutureREGION: multiple ARTs, suppliers and shared services build mobility, energy, public services and digital platform capabilities together.
From one city to one large integrated solution
3 workshop moves
3.1
Introduce FutureREGION
Set the mission: in three PIs the region must become more integrated, sustainable, safe and digitally connected.
3.2
Assign network roles
Use Portfolio / Mayor, Solution Management, Solution Architecture, STE, ART representatives, CoPs, suppliers and customers / citizens.
3.3
Define what winning means
Clarify that the prettiest city does not win. The group is judged by integration quality, roadmap clarity, dependency handling and sync quality.
Module 4
Large Solution Roadmap
Teams produce competing roadmap options and learn that a large solution roadmap is a negotiable hypothesis about capabilities, risks, sequence and decisions.
Create a shared hypothesis before forecasting locally
3 workshop moves
4.1
Create roadmap options
Generate two or three roadmap options across PI 1, PI 2, PI 3 and H1. Include milestones, capabilities, shared services and risks.
4.2
Separate layers
Distinguish capabilities, enablers, supplier milestones, NFRs, integration points, shared foundations and decision cards.
4.3
Expose trade-offs
Ask what gets delayed, what has to be developed first, which ART must absorb enabler work and what the portfolio must decide.
Module 5
ART Forecasts & Capacity
ART groups translate the roadmap into forecasted work and show capacity, KTLO, enablers, dependency load, supplier limits and risks.
Reality check the roadmap through delivery constraints
3 workshop moves
5.1
Build ART Forecast Boards
Each ART fills iteration columns, IP / hardening, capacity buckets, business features, enablers, dependencies and risks.
5.2
Find capacity conflicts
Make visible where roadmap demand exceeds available ART capacity or where KTLO, compliance or supplier work has been underestimated.
5.3
Debrief forecasting assumptions
Discuss where the first roadmap hypothesis survived, where it broke and which information was missing before forecasting started.
Module 6
Integrated Planning Board
The room merges the roadmap and ART forecasts into one planning board. The board becomes the first visible version of the Solution Train operating system.
Bring capability, dependency and decision views together
3 workshop moves
6.1
Build Capability & Dependency Board
Map capabilities such as Mobility Promise, City ID, Emergency Routing, Green Energy and Public Service Portal to needed ARTs, interfaces, target PI and open decisions.
6.2
Fill Solution Sync Backlog
Capture integration blockers, supplier delays, security risks, capacity conflicts and scope trade-offs with owner, options and due date.
6.3
Create the planning board
Connect roadmap, forecasts, dependencies and decision cards with visible strings and status markers.
Module 7
Execution & Solution Sync
Participants execute a first increment, then run Solution Syncs as decision meetings rather than status rounds.
Build first, then realign deliberately
3 workshop moves
7.1
Run first execution round
ARTs build their part of FutureREGION and discover where local progress does not yet create integrated value.
7.2
Run Solution Sync
Use a compact Mini-PI-Planning pattern: all together, breakouts, realignment and explicit carry-over of open issues.
7.3
Debrief the sync quality
Ask whether the meeting created decisions, updated artifacts and pulled in the right expertise, or whether it was only a status meeting.
Module 8
Change Injects & Realignment
Change cards deliberately disturb the plan: supplier delay, security risk, regulatory change, platform bottleneck or management promise.
Force the system to respond under uncertainty
3 workshop moves
8.1
Introduce change injects
Use supplier, compliance, cyber, capacity, architecture, management-gap or citizen-feedback cards to challenge the current roadmap.
8.2
Replan the roadmap
Affected ARTs and representatives update the Solution Roadmap, ART Forecast Boards and Decision Backlog.
8.3
Observe collaboration-network properties
Debrief social connectivity, transparency, freedom of collaboration, decision autonomy, definition of success and psychological safety.
Module 9
Final Demo & Transfer
The final demo and transfer canvas connect the physical FutureREGION model to real roadmapping, sync cadence and decision-right changes in the organization.
Turn the LEGO result into organizational learning
3 workshop moves
9.1
Run Solution Demo
Show the integrated region, explain roadmap changes, ROAM risks, confidence and what was learned about the system.
9.2
Fill Transfer Canvas
Translate simulation learning into current organization: where are the real ARTs, roadmaps, supplier dependencies, syncs and decision bottlenecks?
9.3
Define 30-day follow-up
Choose one real sync cadence to observe for 30 days and run a mini-retro using decision latency, rework, dependency age and roadmap reliability metrics.
Scenario cards
Change injects turn the workshop from planning into realignment practice.
Use inject cards after the first roadmap and forecast have stabilized enough to be challenged. The point is not to punish the room. The point is to create the need for better Solution Syncs.
Supplier delay
External delivery slips by one iteration and forces roadmap and dependency decisions.
Security risk
A new threat model changes architecture and release readiness.
Capacity conflict
One ART loses capacity through KTLO, incident load or urgent compliance evidence.
Management promise
A hard external date appears before integration feasibility is clear.
Platform bottleneck
A shared foundation can serve only one capability first.
Citizen feedback
Customer / user feedback changes the perceived value of the current roadmap.
Customization
The story stays stable. Capabilities and injects become industry-specific.
FutureREGION is only the default metaphor. The same mechanics translate well to automotive, MedTech, retail, banking, manufacturing and public-sector contexts.
Industry
Large Solution
Typical ARTs
Typical injects
Automotive
Software-defined vehicle / OTA
Vehicle platform, cloud, safety, supplier
Regulatory, supplier delay, cyber
MedTech
Connected device / clinical workflow
Imaging, workflow, platform, V&V
FDA evidence, interoperability
Retail
Omnichannel order promise
Web/app, store, payments, logistics
Inventory truth, peak season
Banking
Digital banking platform
Identity, core banking, risk, channels
Compliance, fraud, migration
Manufacturing
Digital thread / MES
PLM, ERP, MES, quality, suppliers
Plant windows, master data
Public sector
Citizen services platform
Portal, identity, case management, data
Policy change, accessibility
Trademark and method note
LEGO-based simulation, not automatically LEGO Serious Play.
This page positions the format as a building-brick simulation for system thinking, roadmapping and decision processes. If certified LEGO Serious Play methods are used intentionally, facilitation and trademark care should be handled separately.
Dynamic Agility
Make higher agile scaling tangible.
Use the LEGO Value Stream Workshop to help leadership, RTEs, STEs, Product Management, architecture, shared services and suppliers experience the difference between local ART planning and integrated Value Stream / Solution Train decision capability.
LEGO Value Stream Workshop anfragen